The Practical Process of Managing and Arranging the Third Party Funding Agreement

Document Type : Original Article

Author
1. PhD in International Trade Law, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to examine the mechanism of management and regulation of third-party funding agreement (TPF). The process begins with the plaintiff's decision to use "TPF" and refer to several potential funders at the same time. How to present the case is very important. The decision regarding the funding of a case will be made after a comprehensive and detailed review by the funder.
Every typical "TPF" agreement consists of a series of financial and non-financial terms such as Budget and Maximum Investment, Adverse Costs and Security for Costs, structure of return on investment, conflict of interest, control, The legal structure of the third-party funder's interest in the proceeds of the case and termination is formed. In addition to the "TPF" agreement, various Ancillary Agreements may also be signed as part of the "TPF" Agreement process, such as Standstill Agreements, Priorities Agreement, Escrow Agreement, Security in the form of Ancillary agreements. Each funder's TPF agreement and Ancillary Documents are different and most TPF agreements that are ultimately executed by the plaintiff are negotiated separately, so the overview of the article focuses on what are best practices and the main observed issues have been identified. TPF is still a developing industry and each new case raises unique issues that have never been considered before
Keywords

  • Books
  • Lein, Eva, Dickinson, Andrew. “Study on the quŁ…estion of effectiveness of an assignment or subrogation of a claim against third parties and the priority of the assigned or subrogated claim over a right of another person”, British Institute of International and Comparative Law (2014). (in English)
  • Nieuwveld, Lisa Bench, Shannon, Victoria . “Third-Party Funding in International Arbitration” ,Second Edition, Kluwer Law International (2017). (in English)
  • Pitkowitz,Nikolaus, Pitkowitz,Grag. “Handbook on Third-Party Funding in International Arbitration,The TPF Handbook”, Editor,Pitkowitz,Nikolaus,Juris. (2018). (in English)
  • Rodgers , Anne M, Incerto, M Scott Incerto and Cummings, Alex E. “Third Party Litigation Funding Law Review”, Law Business Research Ltd (2017). (in English)
  • Rowles-Davies, Nicholas. “Third Party Litigation Funding”, Oxford University Press (2014). (in English).
  • Von Goeler, jonas. “Third-Party Funding in International Arbitration and its Impact on Procedure”, Wolters Kluwer (2016). (in English)

 

 

  • Articles

 

  • Asadi, Mohammad Mahdi. “An Investigation of the Necessity to Disclose the Existence of Contract in Third Party Funding in International Arbitration and Privilege”. Legal Civilization 6(17) (2024): 5-26. (in Persian)
  • Asadi, Mohammad Mahdi. “Third-Party Funding in International Arbitration (TPF)”. Legal Civilization 6(14) (2023): 43-72. (in Persian)
  • Bahmaei, Mohammad Ali, Asadi, Mohammad Mahdi, “The Essential Challenges of Third Party Funding in International Arbitration”, journal of Private Law Research 9(34)(2021); 65-96. (in Persian)
  • Chan , “Proposed Guidelines for the Disclosure of Third-Party Funding Arrangements in International Arbitration”, American Review of International ArbitrationARIA,2 (26) (2015):45. (in English)
  • Choi,Maria . “Third-Party Funders in International Arbitration: A Case for Protecting Communication Made in Order to Finance Arbitration”, The Georgetown Journal of  Legal Ethics833, (29) (2016).883. (in English)
  • Cremades ,Bernardo M . “Chapter 12. Concluding remarks” in . Cremades ,Bernardo M and Dimolitsa Antonias,eds, Third-Party Funding in International Arbitration,ICC Dossier, Kluwer,(2013): 153-156. (in English)
  • Cremades Jr ,Bernardo M.. “Third Party Litigation Funding: Investing in Arbitration”, TDM 8(4)(2011): 1-41 . (in English)
  • Frignati, Valentina. “Ethical implications of third-party funding in international arbitration”, Arbitration International 32(3)(2016): 505-522 . (in English)
  • Goldstein, Marc J. “Should the Real Parties in Interest have to Stand Up? – Thoughts About a Disclosure Regime for Third-Party Funding in International Arbitration”, Transnational Dispute Management , 8(4)(2011):1-24 . (in English)
  • Honlet, Jean-Christophe. “Recent decisions on third-party funding in investment arbitration”, ICSID Review 20(3)(2015): 699-712. (in English)
  • Kuhn , Wolfgang, Van Oeveren, Hanneke. “The Full Recovery of Third-Party Funding Costs in Arbitration: To Be or Not to Be?”, Jornal of International Arbitration 3 (35) (2018):307-328 . (in English).
  • Scherer ,Maxi, Goldsmith ,Aren and Flechet ,Camille. “Third Party Funding in International Arbitration in Europe: Part I: Funders’ Perspectives”, International Business Law Journal (2)(2012): 207-220. (in English)
  • Sebok, Anthony J. “Should the Law Preserve Party Control? Litigation Investment, Insurance Law, and Double Standards”, William & Mary Law Review (56)(2015):833-897. (in English)
  • Silver, Charles,,(2014). “Litigation Funding versus Liability Insurance: What’s the Difference?”, DePaul Law Review 63 (2) (2014):617-653 . (in English)
  • Steinitz ,Maya , Field, Abigail C . “A Model Litigation Funding Contract”, Iowa Law Review(99) (2014):711-772 . (in English).
  • Steinitz, Maya (2012). “The Litigation Finance Contract”, William & Mary Law Review 54 (2)(2012): 455-518 . (in English)

 

 

  • Cases
  • Norscott v. Essar case (ICC Case No. 15790/VRO), Award (17 December 2015).
  • Siag v. King & Spalding LLP 2010 WL 2671580.
  • S&T Oil Equipment v. Juridica Investments Limited 2012 WL 28242 (C.A.5 (Tex.)).
  • Viamedia, Inc. v. Comcast Corp,WL 2834535,2017.

 

 

  • Others
  • Code of Conduct for Litigation Funders , January 2018.
  • Decision of Justice Newbould in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Apr. 16, 2012), Court File No. CV-11-9532-00CL.